The Trump gender policy at the UN has made the administration’s stance crystal clear—at home and on the global stage. U.S. delegates are rejecting the use of the word “gender” in policy documents. This isn’t just a semantic fight. It’s about restoring truth. Biological sex is real. That makes the activist class nervous. They prefer a world where “gender” means whatever they say it means, and anyone who disagrees is labeled a bigot.
ProPublica Spins a Narrative, Buries the Facts
ProPublica recently published a piece by reporter Lisa Song that claims the Trump administration is injecting its “anti-trans agenda” into international environmental policy. The article centers on a U.N. meeting about chemical pollution, where a U.S. delegate used her brief remarks to remind the room that biological sex is not interchangeable with self-declared gender identity. According to Song, this shift in tone signals a dangerous overreach. According to reality, it’s a long-overdue correction. The article tries to sound the alarm, but all it really does is expose just how far the activist class will go to defend an ideology built on denial.
Funny thing—Lisa Song crafts an entire lead around a U.S. delegate “derailing” a U.N. meeting on toxic chemicals to talk about gender, but she doesn’t name that delegate until well into the article. Not in the opening. Not even in the setup. You’d think if it were such a scandalous moment, she’d start by telling readers who said it. But no, the name Liz Nichols—a Ph.D. ecologist and career State Department official—only appears buried deep in the piece. Why? Probably because “qualified woman with science credentials defends biological sex” doesn’t fit the narrative.
The Trump administration is pushing its anti-trans agenda on a global stage, repeatedly objecting to the word “gender” in international resolutions and documents. During at least six speeches before the U.N., U.S. delegates have denounced so-called “gender ideology” or reinforced the administration’s support for language that “recognizes women are biologically female and men are biologically male.” – ProPublica
GOOD!
Biology Isn’t Violence—It’s Reality
The hand-wringing has already started. Critics claim America is “rolling back progress.” But what they call progress looks a lot like erasing women’s rights. The Trump team is rejecting vague language that allows men to claim women’s spaces, sports, and legal protections. Detractors call it an anti-trans agenda. Supporters call it common sense.
Insisting that everyone’s gender is determined biologically at birth leaves no room for the existence of transgender, nonbinary and intersex people, who face discrimination and violence around the world. – ProPublica
Let’s pump the brakes on the genocide narrative. The idea that recognizing biological sex somehow fuels a global campaign of violence against transgender and intersex people is flat-out dishonest. Yes, violence happens, and yes, those cases deserve justice—but there’s no epidemic of people being hunted down simply for being trans. Most of the tragic deaths cited in activist reports come with few public details and even fewer confirmed motives. What we don’t need is more emotional blackmail dressed up as moral authority. Saying “men are men and women are women” is not violence. It’s biology. And pretending otherwise cheapens real human rights crises around the world.
Language and law increasingly undermine women by replacing sex-based terms with gender-neutral ones, redefining sex as gender identity, and referring to women in reductive terms like “birthing people.” This is framed as rejecting “biological essentialism,” rather than recognizing… pic.twitter.com/MRUvkmfp4D
— Gays Against Groomers (@againstgrmrs) July 29, 2025
Executive Orders with Teeth
Trump’s executive orders set the tone fast. Executive Order 14168 reaffirms that sex is biological and strips federal funding from gender surgeries and hormone treatments. Another bans transgender individuals from serving in the military. A third stops gender-transition procedures for minors and tells insurers and federal agencies to cut ties with providers who offer them.
None of this should surprise anyone. Trump campaigned on ending taxpayer support for gender ideology. Now he’s doing exactly that. And the outrage from the usual suspects is a sign he hit the mark.
Girls have lost sports scholarships to boys in makeup. Teenage detransitioners are left with scars and silence. Women are told to share shelters, showers, and prisons with men who simply identify their way in. These aren’t hypotheticals. They’re real stories, and they’re mounting. The executive orders don’t just signal a policy shift. They mark a return to reality.
Congress Weighs In—But It Shouldn’t Have To
Congress hasn’t passed sweeping national laws on transgender issues, but the legislative fight is active. Republicans have introduced bills like the “Protecting Women’s Private Spaces Act,” which would ban biological males from female bathrooms on federal property. Others, like the PROTECT Kids Act, aim to keep parents informed before schools change a child’s pronouns or gender identity.
The 2025 defense spending bill even blocks military health plans from covering gender transitions for minors. And state legislatures have moved even faster. Over half the country has now banned gender procedures for youth. The Supreme Court upheld Tennessee’s ban in June.
It’s a damn shame any of this needs legislation. We now have to pass laws just to say women should have their own locker rooms. That parents should know what schools are doing to their kids. That medical experiments on minors might not be “care.” Lawmakers are spelling out what biology already proves because activist judges, bureaucrats, and nonprofits forced their hand.
Holding the Line at the U.N.
This fight isn’t staying inside our borders. The U.N. has long played host to activist language dressed up as policy. For years, American diplomats let it slide. Trump’s team isn’t having it. U.S. delegates are now blocking “gender” references in international agreements. They’re pushing for biological clarity in documents about women’s rights, climate, and global health.
That resistance has triggered international pearl-clutching. Critics accuse the U.S. of setting a “dangerous precedent.” What they really mean is that we’re no longer letting unelected bureaucrats redefine human identity by committee.
Restoring Sanity
The radical gender movement never relied on facts. It relied on fear—fear of being called names, fear of losing jobs, fear of speaking up. That fear is finally cracking. Trump’s team is using executive power and foreign policy to draw a hard line. Not just for voters, but for every institution that thought it could rewrite reality and demand applause.
But while the government may be shifting course, private companies are still bowing to the cult. I recently had to sign an employee handbook that told me, in no uncertain terms, I must play along if a man in heels wants to be treated as a woman. No questions, no objections, just silent compliance—or else. That’s not inclusion. That’s coercion.
The Trump administration’s stance isn’t radical—it’s corrective. It’s saying what too many are afraid to say out loud: men are not women, and women shouldn’t have to sacrifice truth, safety, or privacy to appease delusion. So, when my employer inevitably hires a man in stilettos who demands access to the women’s bathroom? I won’t play along. I’ll make a scene, then hand in my resignation.
For years, this movement steamrolled through culture, law, and language without a fight. Now the pushback has begun, and the people clutching their pearls about it are the same ones who helped create the mess. We don’t need more euphemisms. We need a spine. And if reclaiming reality offends the global elite and gender ideologues? Good. Let them be offended. The rest of us are done playing pretend.
Feature Image: Created in Canva Pro
The post Trump Gender Policy at the UN: A Long-Overdue Return to Reality appeared first on An Americanist.
Leave a Reply